Category: Portfolio Management Systems


iStock_000011903357XSmallAs quarter end approaches once more, investment advisors gather their resolve and strive to implement new system enhancements to client statements before Q2 arrives. We all wish it could be different, but it is simply the nature of the business. Even firms with good-looking statements may rush to enhance them by incorporating new features such as blended indexes or minor report edits prior to quarter end.

Most of the systems implemented at investment advisories are run on a daily basis, but client statements are typically generated on a quarterly basis. Some investment managers produce monthly statements, but they are in the minority. In the near future, these types of periodic statements will become less relevant than an investor’s ability to generate meaningful client statements on demand.

Amending the quarterly reporting process and report packages requires a disciplined process of setting manageable goals, gaining approval, implementing changes, testing systems and resolving potential problems. Those responsible for creating the reports require approval from management, and until they get that final approval, the time necessary to comfortably implement the changes continues to slip away.

“THE ONLY CONSTANT IS CHANGE” -Heraclitus

As quarter end gets closer, it is not unusual for those involved in the project to get mixed messages about what needs to be done for this quarter. Operations staff juggle various responsibilities. Ad hoc requests, changing priorities and management decision delays inevitably create the need to do last-minute work or postpone the project until the next month, quarter, or even year. With these types of delays, it is a wonder that any progress towards creating better client statements is ever made.

At most larger firms, management is comprised of a number of voices that have a say in whether a firm adapts new systems and reports. The decision to change quarterly reports isn’t made in a vacuum. It is a decision that may depend on a firm’s dedication to their current portfolio management system or a need to allocate limited budget resources to other high-priority issues. Good quarterly reports also underscore a firm’s philosophy, so deep thought and considerable discourse can play a part in determining the content and appearance of client statements.

SOME AXYS USERS DO NOTHING WHILE OTHERS THINK ABOUT MAKING A DECISION.

Before you summarily dismiss all Axys users as being hopelessly outdated and technically inept because they haven’t upgraded to APX or moved to another more recently released Portfolio Management System (PMS), you should understand that there are many decent-sized firms out there that are still using Axys to manage hundreds of millions or billions in assets.  Though a small group of firms really do fit the preceding description, most firms do not. The majority are firms that understand the current shortcomings of Axys and the potential benefits of APX, but also value the simplicity, efficiency, and reliability of Axys.  These firms may have considered Advent’s other offerings: Black Diamond and Geneva, but haven’t managed to find a solution that works for their firm.

As a growing number of these Axys users may be questioning their commitment to Advent, it is only natural that they vacillate to some degree between putting more money into their existing platform or changing the platform altogether. I suspect that many of Advent’s Axys clients now fit into two categories: those who are indifferent and those facing decision paralysis.

Those who are indifferent use Axys like a calculator and will continue to do so until it becomes apparent that they cannot use it any more. Those facing decision paralysis will also continue to use Axys – albeit with some reservations – until another vendor steals them away or Advent makes a bold announcement to continue to support these lost souls with renewed vigor.

In the end, a firm’s need to keep pace with client expectations and technology by providing innovative reporting should win out whether that is achieved by spending money on their existing platform or embracing another. For now, like many in the industry, I continue to hurry up and wait for investment advisors and Advent Software to do something.

–

About the Author: Kevin Shea is President of InfoSystems Integrated, Inc. (ISI); ISI provides a wide variety of outsourced IT solutions to investment advisors nationwide.

For details, please visit isitc.com, contact Kevin Shea via phone at 617-720-3400 x202 or e-mail at kshea@isitc.com.

Account vs InflationReporting a portfolio’s comparative performance against representative benchmarks over various periods of time has been an widely implemented technique of investment advisors for decades.  Firms do this in a variety of different ways, and some methods are more meaningful than others.

Advisors may show the CPI as a baseline index against the portfolio and other indexes in an effort to illustrate how their investments have performed against inflation and hopefully point out the most basic benefit of investing with their firm versus keeping it under the mattress.

If a firm manages equity they may show the the Dow Jones or the S&P 500 indexes.  If they manage international equities, or have a bond component they will likely show other representative indexes.  They may further isolate performance by asset class and show it with the corresponding indexes to facilitate a client’s ability to draw a direct comparison between the performance of like asset classes and underscore the value they add to the investing process of specific asset classes.

PROBLEMS WITH TOTAL PERFORMANCE BLENDS

Firms typically show total performance too, but many run afoul when trying to show a representative index to match total portfolio performance.  Portfolio management systems like Advent Axys and APX have long supported the ability to create blended indexes, but the actual implementation of the feature falls short of real-world requirements.  In the past, many advisors were content to create a blended index with static weights, but firms soon recognized that these ballpark blends weren’t good enough for their requirements because they didn’t accurately reflect the asset mix of their portfolios over time.

Advent Software initially supported the creation of blended indexes in their portfolio management systems (Proport and Axys) through a report that was engineered to create simple index blends.  This method of creating indexes was somewhat limited because index weights couldn’t be changed over time, but it allowed advisors to manage many indexes centrally through the use of scripts and macros, and it also created separate index (DEX) files.  Having separate files allowed clients to track and show a number of blends if they chose to.

Advent improved the feature to some degree by creating the synthetic index, which allows users to change index weights over time on an individual portfolio basis.  The synthetic index feature works best when used to create ad hoc indexes for selected portfolios, but when users try to scale the feature to be used for a large number of portfolios its usefulness tested.  The ability to change the index weights over time is a plus, but updating the info in an automated fashion is not a feature of the system.

AUTOMATED BLENDING SOLUTIONS

In the early 90s, we started working with advisors to create custom blends with dynamic index weights in order to match the ever changing asset mix of portfolios.  This was done by categorizing assets as fundamental asset types, and assigning those asset types to like indexes.  Once the infrastructure was created we created an extract containing the historic month end asset type weights for all portfolios and used those weights along their corresponding index returns over time to create a true blended index.  The process was automated with a combination of Axys reports, macros, scripts and Visual Basic.

Years ago, we  helped firms address the some of the short-comings of the synthetic index feature by creating a product dedicated to creating blended indexes and managing them.  This allowed users to manage the indexes centrally rather than at the portfolio level.

Last year, we revisited the problem of effectively managing custom index blends for Axys and APX users again.  This time we automated the process of refreshing the index weights stored in each portfolio’s corresponding performance file through a process that updates the synthetic weights by stripping the performance files of their synthetic weight values and rewriting them based on each portfolio’s asset mix and correspondingly assigned indexes.  The process builds monthly synthetic index weights for the inception-to-date period.

This most recent update to our index blending automation tool leverages Advent’s synthetic index capability, and adds the much needed automation that users require to implement the existing synthetic index feature in a way that makes more sense.  Unfortunately, there are still limits to the built-in blending functions of Axys and APX.  For example, synthetic indexes create a blend called simply “Blend”, and users trying to show multiple blends need to create those other blends somewhere else and then generate index files, so that they can be shown alongside synthetic blended indexes.

Thankfully, Advent’s import/export functions, scripting and macros allow savvy users to workaround these limitations as long as they are willing to roll up their sleeves and do a little work or know someone who can help.

–

About the Author: Kevin Shea is President of InfoSystems Integrated, Inc. (ISI); ISI provides a wide variety of outsourced IT solutions to investment advisors nationwide.

For details, please visit isitc.com, contact Kevin Shea via phone at 617-720-3400 x202 or e-mail at kshea@isitc.com.

Dad_Vero_ClippedQuarter end reporting for Q4 2011 was a grueling task – one that still wasn’t completed for some firms in February of 2012. I am in touch with the operations staff of representative investment firms of varied disciplines and sizes. That quarter I heard it from just about everybody. Firms were transferring accounts to different custodians, embracing new trading platforms, contemplating portfolio management system changes and enhancements to client-facing reporting as well as more robust outsourcing options … but the show must go on.

The operations staff rarely gets a break. They must deal with new initiatives as they come and still manage to get their regular work done. The act of balancing the two responsibilities can be difficult and exhausting for those faced with these demands. To quote one of my clients, “Every time you turn around its quarter end.”

As a consultant to many of these firms, I have a unique view of the daily grind of typical investment professionals. In the past, they could take reasonable breaks for lunch, etc., but more and more of the people I work with are going without the niceties of lunches out and a little down-time during the day. An illness in the family can be particularly troublesome for those working in investment operations to deal with. Illnesses are seldom convenient or negotiable.

In addition to the normal challenges that I face in any given quarter, that quarter I had to deal with one that I had no control over – the death of a loved one. My father, who, at age 73, seemed to be in outstanding health had a sudden and unexpected heart attack on the evening of January 23rd, 2012. There is never a good time for something like that to happen, but the 23rd was better than the 8th would have been for me. I was on the phone with him when it happened, and heard him utter his last words, “I feel so dizzy.” Then he collapsed.

It was so quick. I could hardly comprehend it. Over the course of the next few hours my brother and sister traveled home to New York to be with my mother as quickly as possible, while I tried to think about what I needed to do to wrap up any loose ends related to my clients’ quarter end reporting, and get home as soon as possible. After a day and half of chipping away at various tasks and setting things in motion, I needed to go home and grieve our loss with my family.

Dennis_shaking_hands_DR003My father had a successful career as a financial officer in the retail and financial service industries acting as consultant to many banks and fortune 500 companies. He kept his financial dealings fairly close to the vest, and though he had shared some of what he had done with me, I was not familiar with everything. His record-keeping was meticulous and nearly perfect in all respects but one – planning for his unexpected death. He had a joint will with my mother, but we couldn’t find it. He had assets and regular income, but getting my mother access to all of their assets would take time.

Over the next week, I went over his records, which included 22 years of tax returns and similar detailed records of my parent’s finances to lend what help I could in assessing the situation for my mother. I am no stranger to investment reports, so I winced when I saw my father’s Morgan Stanley Smith Barney statements. The production of statements as meaningless as these should be a criminal offense. I first saw statements like these back in 1987. In twenty-five years very little has changed. The statements are as dull and drab as possible. The only color afforded is the dark blue line that runs along the top. These statements are difficult for people who know what they are looking for to read – never mind those less familiar. At best, these statements are an inventory of holdings.

After looking through more of the investment statements, I eventually found summary statements that get sent out about a month after each quarter end. These statements were better, but not as good as most of what we create for our clients. Given their ability to produce better statements, firms like Morgan Stanley Smith Barney should be held to a higher reporting standard.

Over the course of nearly two weeks, my brother and I stoically exchanged quips like “Good will hunting” and “Where there is a will there’s a way” in humor that my father would have appreciated. Eventually, we found the will. It was perhaps the only thing improperly filed in his office. Throughout the ordeal, I couldn’t help thinking about how my father could have made things much easier for us by leaving us a list of the top ten things to do if he died. It might have taken him twenty minutes to put together if he had ever thought about it. I half expected to find such a list, but it was nowhere to be found – apparently, my Dad wasn’t planning to die. Here is what the list might have said:

Sorry to leave you all so suddenly, but here is what you need to do:

1. Call my attorney _______________ at _______________ , and have him execute my will. For some reason, I have the original copy of my will in the file marked _________________ at our home in ________________.

2. I have three whole life insurance policies that should provide a total non-taxable death benefit of approximately ___________________ .

They are:
a. _______________________________
b. _______________________________
c. _______________________________

Call my good friend _______________________ in the insurance business at ______________ and have him help you get the forms and file them. The proceeds from my life insurance should help with the transition period.

3. In the event of my passing, Mom should have access to the following regular income sources totaling about ________ per month:
a. ________ Pension.
b. My social security not hers.
c. The annuity.

4. All of the bank accounts are jointly held and your mother is listed as the primary beneficiary.

5. My retirement account will need to be transferred to her and she is listed as the primary beneficiary.

6. There is no money hidden anywhere. It was already raining.

7. Put the funeral on the Amex and the meal afterwards on the Underhill tab.

8. Yes. I want the cheapest casket.

9. Psalm 23.

10. Swing easy.

Love,
Dad

Using my personal experience with my father as an example, we can hopefully learn something.  First and foremost, we should make sure to acknowledge our own mortality and take the steps necessary to make our passing easier on those we would leave behind.  And, of course, since this blog is about investment operations and technology, ensure that your firm has the contingency planning, documentation, staff redundancy and training necessary to survive the loss of key personnel, whether that loss is through a sudden career change, a long-term illness, or an unexpected tragedy.

The impetus for some of the best client relationships I have ever had has been the vacuum created by the loss of personnel.  I have helped firms that experienced 100% turnover in their investment operations department rebuild, assisted those trying to make sense of cryptic documentation left behind by co-workers who left abruptly, and managed to get things running again when the person who “did everything” was severely injured in an automobile accident.

Understanding your firm’s dependancy on key personnel is very important.  Even when systems are documented, that documentation’s usefulness may be questionable.  Documentation that hasn’t been reviewed and tested might be meaningful to those who created it, but not to those trying to use it to complete a process in the author’s absence.

Some of my clients have actually drafted letters to be delivered to their investors in the event of their deaths. Those letters are in their contingency plan – what’s in yours?

–

About the Author: Kevin Shea is President of InfoSystems Integrated, Inc. (ISI); ISI provides a wide variety of outsourced IT solutions to investment advisors nationwide.

For details, please visit isitc.com, contact Kevin Shea via phone at 617-720-3400 x202 or e-mail at kshea@isitc.com.

In my role over the years as a designer and developer of client reporting packages for dozens of investment advisors, I typically work with decision-makers to facilitate the creation of new client presentations. Many of my clients already know what they want and just need help making it happen.

Though I have an excellent understanding of what is important to most investors and their clients, my opinion is seldom solicited. I speak up when an issue demands it, but most of the time I defer to advisors, listen, and do my best to create what my clients (investment managers) want. In many cases, the bulk of the project is spent on individual report exhibits with little emphasis on the way reports are organized and presented to clients.

I have worked with firms who have wanted to do the bare minimum for their clients (appraisal, and invoice) as well as clients that go above and beyond their duty to report. However, even those with the best reporting intentions can err by including a level of complexity and detail that will not benefit their clients.

On occasion, I am lucky enough to work with investment professionals who are modern thinkers and savvy marketers. The combination of these important characteristics leads to engaging projects and sophisticated report packages. These advisors apparently understand what their clients want to see, and are determined to make the desired reports a reality.

Instead of reporting only what is required, these advisors are trying to exceed the reporting expectations of their clients, and in doing so they engender trust. Their reports are comprehensive and transparent. As such, they have the possibility of highlighting poor performance, but that is a risk that needs to be taken by most advisors. The significance of disclosing this level of information is recognized by investors’ clients and should improve client communications.

In terms of presentation, reports should be bound, with a cover and/or table of contents and well-organized. When a client opens the report up, the most important things are first, and less important details follow. For example, there is a hierarchy to the way the reports are organized in the package such that the relationship is reported first and individual account reports later.  You can view a full report sample illustrating this approach here. In this specific example, the physical report package opens to display pages two and three of the PDF document, which are a relationship summary. The pages that follow provide account-level information.

Reports are typically bound electronically (i.e. PDFs) for those who deliver reports through portals or encrypted email, but firms send most their reports out on paper due to low adoption rates. Paper copies should look professional, and there are cost-efficient options to make this possible whether it is done through printing report packages on 11×17 stock with a saddle stitch or via manual binding of reports after they have been printed. Some of the manual binding options are fairly quick, but shops with hundreds or thousands of reports should not bind reports manually.

Another key to producing impressive report packages is the one-page summary, which allows a client to look at a single page if that is all they want to see. Usually, it is an exhibit that shows them where their investments are, how much they are worth, how they have grown, and how they have performed over various time periods. One-page summaries are also produced to provide information about specific asset types and performance. The idea is to create an executive summary. Clients really want a concise overview of their investments, and rarely look at all the other details that get sent to them on a quarterly basis.

How will you know if your reports have made an impression?

You will hear it from your clients. Even hard-to-please clients should appreciate these types of report improvements. So get to work now, and your new report packages could be ready for next quarter.

–

About the Author: Kevin Shea is President of InfoSystems Integrated, Inc. (ISI); ISI provides a wide variety of outsourced IT solutions to investment advisors nationwide.

For details, please visit isitc.com, contact Kevin Shea via phone at 617-720-3400 x202 or e-mail at kshea@isitc.com.